VALUING SUSTAINABILITY GOES FAR BEYOND THE FINANCIAL RETURN

By Tim Walden, November 24, 2009

Recently I read an MIT Sloan study on sustainability and came across this quote representing a more cynical view on corporate sustainability: “My only objective is [a high] return on equity, and I hope that the CEOs who manage the companies in which I invest my savings reason just as I do.” Though extreme, those of us in the business community know that there is some inherent truth in this statement. I do believe that many companies have embraced the awareness of sustainability, but feel that the awareness has not manifested itself to a comprehensive tangible plan of attack. It’s easily understood why; in this economic environment it’s hard to sell to the CFOs who are looking at the business case when it comes to return on investment. Many companies expect that sustainability endeavor will add to their costs, deliver no immediate financial benefits, and quite possibly erode their competitiveness.

When it comes to sustainable investments in new or existing facilities, the main issue that executives face is the ability to tie the value of these policies and investments back to real financial impacts. It’s been my experience that leadership feels that the effects of such programs are either too indirect to value or too embedded in the business to even value at a macro financial level. With that being said, I pose the question: Does it all stop there? Do we only invest in the initiatives that provide us a quick and best return? What do our facilities say about our strategic value and commitment to the environment? The premise that I place out there is: Have companies missed the greater strategic value created by sustainable facility investments by allowing “return on investment” to be the driving criteria for facility investment?

Companies that are creating real values through increased revenue, decreased cost and reduced risks are adopting strategic frameworks that looks at a comprehensive set of values generated through sustainable investments. The key is to understand how each of these investments is impacting the strategic values of the organization. By understanding this relationship, organizations can identify and develop metrics for measuring the performance of the investment. Not sure if you’re evaluating the value of your sustainability investments in a comprehensive way? How do your responses to the following resonate?

  • How are you evaluating the value that is derived from customer awareness?
  • Beside the standard return on investment, what financial metrics do you have in place that comprehend a larger impact to the financial picture?
  • Bottom line values can be derived from internal sustainable process improvements, but what value do you plan on capturing from the greater supply chain?
  • How do your employees values sustainability and how is that value being measured throughout the organization?

Is a greater value being missed? We are interested in your thoughts and approaches to sustainability strategy, initiatives and investments.

Comments (2)
ROI's are excuses not to do anything. I would like to develop a ROSI (Return on Sustainability Investment) for small companies that is not quite as complicated as the HDR SROI linked here, and provides prospective savings that will result from the sustainability investment.
http://www.hdrinc.com/Assets/documents/sustainability/SROIOverview.pdf
Hope this helps a bit...

By on 12/8/09
mlcommunications.com
Great article. I'm developing some customer retention and aquisition models at the moment anchored in an investment in genuinely enabling customers live in more sustainable homes. The potential impact is very difficult to measure - customers tell us they need more support and guidance - and that they would respond positively to that, but getting real numbers back that's a challenge!.
Also Might be interesting to read more on McKinseys recent report (Nov 09) "48% of business respondants belived that eco-friendly strategies had boosted brand loyalty and reputation. V’s 47% for healthier safer products and 41% for addressing privacy concerns.
The area most likely to attract political and public attention was the environment at 49%
Responding to the publics higher expectations for business role in society, best practice companies will address the social and political issues while seeing the potential to create shareholder value."


By on 12/8/09
www.esb.ie
Post a comment
Name:
Email: (email will not be posted)
Website:
Your comments: